Political rights and freedoms does the apron Notes freedom struggle Harmonies contrast Culture Comm

x This site uses cookies and third-own-to collect statistical information about navigation and display advertising. If you continue browsing, it is considered that accepting the s. For more information, see our Legal Warning.
Political rights and freedoms does the apron Notes freedom struggle Harmonies contrast Culture Communication Language locus Histria locus Territory International Economics Labor Health Education's public-Res genre
Militancy in the workplace has been a work plan approved by certain organizations of Independence Left in recent years. The political motives and historical, have been repeated so often that just mentioning them briefly: IE, from birth to PSAN did not pay enough attention to the union front, let alone the possibility of promoting own project on key national and class. Then CCOO could still be considered a union consistent, disruptive and class, and it was not the time he was discrediting themselves, seeing the extent and severity of the betrayal of Transition. This shortcoming has been dragged to the strategic EI until today under various pretexts, while the separatist militant unions participated in several projects more or less disruptive, more or less minority interests, and more or less related to the ideological principles of the EI.
But far from wanting spoke on the various debates and political currents that throughout the history of EI have advocated a greater or lesser locus involvement in the deal and union labor, which motivates me to write this article is a call to action.
Now, now it seems a new generation of working locus poor in the length and breadth of the country putting the batteries to address this important battlefront from the perspective of gender liberation, national and class. Appear and new trade unions affiliated to different regions of COS Catalonia. Now there is no excuse today is now a possibility. For those who have a job, to be partial and precarious now simply a matter of doing it or not doing it.
However, most go pulling and pushing in that day happens, as if it was not us, and leave for later. How is it? We can discuss it rationally, but in this case we have to flee the rhetoric and arguments cheats. Argued that today's work is so fragmented structure of a union is not the optimal approach to the battlefront work. That in this century battlefront can no longer be the backbone of any revolution. Unionism locus is an economic struggle locus that basically claim is based on better operating conditions, a salary that is no less unfair locus to be well paid. Some clueless even argue that there is no class struggle.
But more or less certain that these claims are, none of these arguments locus suggests an alternative. We just switched off; justify our passivity. Because in the end we know that the military job is not as easy as military street or around a table. And in the background we think (wrongly) that the military job is more dangerous, and that's scary. Now, go back: that the conditions for membership are working very hard may be an argument for doing nothing? I dare to throw the following hypothesis: that deep yet we believe the feminist locus slogan "the personal is political." And it's time to recognize the value of many feminist theories, not only for the scope of the release of the genre, but for all the revolutionary struggle. Bringing politics to the private sphere, fight naturalization of operating conditions, paying attention to each of the relations of power and domination, the "glass ceiling" ... are concepts that not only serve combating discrimination and violence against women.
In the present case, many of us still do not dare to military until after seven in the evening. Claiming the end of the privatization of UA & P.